Crystal Holmes v. Rosalina Harris

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CRYSTAL HOLMES, No. 21-55330 21-55566 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-03739-PSG-E v.

ROSALINA HARRIS, in her individual and MEMORANDUM* official capacity; DEAN HARRIS, an individual,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

ARLANI HARRIS, an individual; DOES, 1- 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 13, 2022** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: CALLAHAN and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and ARTERTON,*** District Judge.

Appellants Dean M. Harris and Rosalina Harris appeal the district court’s

denial of a motion for reconsideration as well as the sale order of their home. We

affirm the…