In re M.V. CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 2022D079473California10,725 words

Opinion

Opinion

Do, J.

INTRODUCTION

After declaring them dependents of the court, the juvenile court removed M.V. and I.V. (together, Children) from the physical custody of their parents, J.V. (Father) and M.Z. (Mother), and placed them with a relative caregiver pending reunification efforts. Father, Mother, and the Children appeal those dispositional orders. They assert substantial evidence does not support the court’s findings, by clear and convincing evidence, that there was substantial danger to the Children if they were returned home and that there were no reasonable means to protect them without removing them from their parents’ custody. On the record before us, we agree. Accordingly, we reverse the dispositional orders as to both Father and Mother.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

I. Dependency Proceedings Before the Children’s Removal Father and Mother had been together for about five years when dependency proceedings were initiated in June 2021. Later that same month, they married. They have two children, M.V. and I.V., who were at the relevant time three and two years old, respectively. Father also has joint custody of his six-year-old son, A.V., from a previous relationship. The family

2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.