Ysaul Flores Peralta v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202219-70274California1,193 words

Opinion

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APR 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

YSAUL FLORES PERALTA, No. 19-70274 19-72497 Petitioner, Agency No. A091-522-862 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney ORDER AMENDING General, MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION

AND DENYING PETITIONER’S

Respondent. BILL OF COSTS

Before: HAWKINS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON,* District Judge.

The memorandum disposition filed on April 5, 2022, is hereby amended as

follows:

Page 5, Line 12: Change

19-70274.> to

not entitled to his costs against the federal government because he is proceeding in

forma pauperis. See Wade v. Kijakazi, 14 F.4th 973 (9th Cir. 2021).>.

With this amendment, Petitioner’s bill of costs (Dkt. No. 92) is DENIED.

* The Honorable Dean D. Pregerson, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.