Ricardo Valdivia-Anguiano v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 202219-70186California606 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICARDO VALDIVIA-ANGUIANO, No. 19-70186

Petitioner, Agency No. A060-658-698

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 18, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and ZIPPS,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Ricardo Valdivia-Anguiano, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jennifer G. Zipps, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum and withholding of removal, and

reversing the IJ’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.