Estrada

People v. Estrada

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 25, 2022B311019California2,458 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

I. Governing Law

On January 1, 2019, Senate Bill No. 1437 took effect “ ‘to amend the felony murder rule and the natural and probable consequences doctrine, as it relates to murder, to ensure that murder liability is not imposed on a person who is not the actual killer, did not act with the intent to kill, or was not a major participant in the underlying felony who acted with reckless indifference to human life.’ ” (People v. Lewis (2021) 11 Cal.5th 952, 959 (Lewis).) Senate Bill No. 1437 amended sections 188 and 189 of the Penal Code and added section 1170.95, which

3 provides a procedure for individuals convicted of murder who could not be convicted under the law as amended to retroactively seek relief. (Lewis, supra, 11 Cal.5th at p. 957; People v. Gentile (2020) 10 Cal.5th 830, 842–843 (Gentile).) Section 1170.95 created a three-part eligibility test: (1) the defendant must have been charged with murder by means of a charging document that allowed the prosecution to proceed under a theory of felony murder or under the natural and probable consequences doctrine, (2) the defendant must have been convicted of first or second degree murder, and (3) the defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.