Miraskandari

Miraskandari v. Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 25, 2022B301785MCalifornia16,790 words

Opinion

Opinion

Egerton, J.

Filed 4/25/22 (unmodified opinion attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

SHAHROKH MIRESKANDARI, B301785

Plaintiff and Appellant, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC517799 v.

EDWARDS WILDMAN ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

PALMER LLP et al., [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

Defendants and Respondents.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed on April 8, 2022, be modified as follows: The following additional paragraph should be added to footnote 1, on page 3: “Mireskandari’s lead appellate counsel, Becky S. James, filed the opening brief and appellant’s appendix while at her former firm, James & Associates. In mid-2021, James merged her former firm with Dykema Gosset, and Mireskandari retained Dykema Gosset to represent him in this appeal and to file the appellant’s reply brief on his behalf. In his reply brief, Mireskandari opposed the motion for sanctions without authorization. (Rule 8.276(d) [“An opposition [to a motion for sanctions] may not be filed unless the court sends [written] notice”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.