People v. Salinas CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 25, 2022F079629California19,761 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

Between October 2008 and July 2017,1 defendant Pedro Salinas sexually abused his girlfriend’s young daughter and the daughter’s cousin multiple times. A jury convicted defendant of multiple counts of lewd acts upon a child under 14 years of age (some committed by force), sodomy of a child under 14 years of age, forcible sodomy of a minor, and sexual penetration of a minor. The trial court sentenced defendant to a total term of 122 years to life in prison, including five separate terms of 15 years to life, pursuant to the “One Strike” law (Pen. Code, § 667.61).2 Defendant contends on appeal (1) the evidence was insufficient to prove that the victim was under 14 years of age at the time of the lewd act charged in count 5; (2) the evidence was insufficient to prove forcible sexual penetration of a child 14 years of age or older, as charged in count 12, because the act of penetration involved use of defendant’s penis which is not a foreign object for purposes of the statute; (3) the trial court erred in not staying his sentence as to count 8 because it involved the same act of forcible sodomy as charged in count 9; and (4) the trial court erred in instructing the jury to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.