Bijon Hill v. Walmart Inc.
32 F.4th 811
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 26, 202221-15180California6,277 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BIJON HILL, No. 21-15180 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 4:19-cv-05436-
JST
WALMART INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 9, 2021 Pasadena, California
Filed April 26, 2022
Before: PAUL J. KELLY, JR., * MILAN D. SMITH, JR., and DANIELLE J. FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.
* The Honorable Paul J. Kelly, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. SUMMARY **
California Employment Law
The panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Walmart in a diversity action brought by a plaintiff who alleged that Walmart owed her penalties pursuant to California Labor Code § 203 because it failed to pay her immediately after several photo shoots.