In re J.B. CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 26, 2022E077873California2,114 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

The subjects of this dependency are mother’s three children—J.B. (born 2007),

N.B. (born 2013), and O.B. (born 2017). On May 17, 2019, the department received a

referral alleging the children were at risk of neglect. On July 24, the department

interviewed both parents, and both denied having Indian ancestry.

On August 14, 2019, the department filed a petition under section 300,

subdivision (b).

On August 20, 2019, mother filed an ICWA-020 form (Judicial Council Forms,

form ICWA-020 (ICWA-020)) in which she checked the box stating, “I have no Indian

ancestry as far as I know.” That same day mother’s counsel told the judge, “Mother

claims no Indian ancestry.” The children’s father also filled out an ICWA-020 form

claiming no knowledge of any Indian ancestry, and his counsel told the judge, “[t]here is

no ICWA.” The judge found the department “conducted a sufficient inquiry regarding

2 whether the child/children may have Indian ancestry,” and concluded ICWA didn’t

apply.

As of September 4, 2019, mother lived with the children’s maternal grandmother

and one maternal aunt. The children also have a maternal aunt in Georgia.

The judge held a contested jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.