Vitaly Pilkin v. Google LLC

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VITALY E. PILKIN, No. 21-16346

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-01483-DMR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Donna M. Ryu, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted April 11, 2022***

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Vitaly E. Pilkin appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action alleging copyright infringement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 12(b)(6). Cervantes v. United States, 330 F.3d…