Tingting Zhang v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 26, 202219-72406California3,169 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TINGTING ZHANG, No. 19-72406

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-336-830

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 9, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSEN,** District Judge. Dissent by Judge VANDYKE.

Tingting Zhang, a citizen of China, seeks review of a decision by the Board

of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing her appeal from an order of an

Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying her applications for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We grant

the petition for review.

1. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.