Stephen Tanner, I v. Idaho Department of Fish and Game

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 26, 202220-35886California625 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN A. TANNER I, No. 20-35886

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00456-DCN

v.

MEMORANDUM*

IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND

GAME; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 26, 2022**

Before: D.W. NELSON, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Stephen (“Steve”) Tanner appeals pro se the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his First, Fourth, and

Fifth Amendment rights and his rights under the Idaho Constitution. We review de

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment. Thomas v. Ponder, 611 F.3d

1144, 1149 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.