Stephen Tanner, I v. Idaho Department of Fish and Game
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEPHEN A. TANNER I, No. 20-35886
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00456-DCN
v.
MEMORANDUM*
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND
GAME; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 26, 2022**
Before: D.W. NELSON, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Stephen (“Steve”) Tanner appeals pro se the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his First, Fourth, and
Fifth Amendment rights and his rights under the Idaho Constitution. We review de
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment. Thomas v. Ponder, 611 F.3d
1144, 1149 (9th Cir.…