Claudia Azucena-Merino v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 26, 202220-71551California824 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 26 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CLAUDIA ELIZABETH AZUCENA- No. 20-71551

MERINO,

Agency No. A208-761-789 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 11, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and IMMERGUT,*** District Judge.

Claudia Elizabeth Azucena-Merino, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Karin J. Immergut, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. 1 petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)

dismissing an appeal of an order by the Immigration Judge (IJ) denying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.