People v. Ramos CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 26, 2022D078369California6,003 words

Opinion

Opinion

Irion, J.

I.

BACKGROUND

A. Charges The People charged Ramos with 29 crimes against three minors during the period from 2002 through 2018: • five counts of aggravated sexual assault by forcible sodomy of a child under the age of 14 years (victim: Jane Doe 1); • one count of aggravated sexual assault by forcible rape of a child under the age of 14 years (victim: Jane Doe 1); • 11 counts of forcible lewd and lascivious acts upon a child under the age of 14 years (victims: Jane Doe 1 on 6 counts & Jane Doe 3 on 5 counts); • four counts of rape of a child 14 years of age or older (victim: Jane Doe 1); • two counts of forcible rape (victim: Jane Doe 1); • one count of false imprisonment by menace, fraud, violence, or deceit (victim: Jane Doe 3); • three counts of oral copulation of a child 10 years of age or younger (victim: Jane Doe 3); and • two counts of nonforcible lewd or lascivious acts on a child under the age of 14 years (victim: Jane Doe 2). The People alleged Ramos qualified for sentencing under the One Strike law because he had committed sex crimes against more than one victim. (Pen. Code, § 667.61, subd. (e)(4); subsequent undesignated section references are to this code.) B. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.