Burunsuzyan

Burunsuzyan v. Roger CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 26, 2022B313917California6,471 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 4/26/22 Burunsuzyan v. Roger CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

MARO BURUNSUZYAN, B313917

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV08621) v.

DIMITRI ROGER,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David Sotelo, Judge. Affirmed. Revolve Law Group and Kimberly A. Wright for Defendant and Appellant. Law Offices of Robert E. Weiss and Cris A. Klingerman for Plaintiff and Respondent.

_________________________ Dimitri Roger appeals from an order denying his motion to set aside the default judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Maro Burunsuzyan. Burunsuzyan sued Roger for invasion of privacy by public disclosure of private facts,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.