H.T.L. Properties, LLC v. Speck CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 26, 2022B302436California1,925 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/26/22 H.T.L. Properties, LLC v. Speck CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

H.T.L. PROPERTIES, LLC et al. B302436

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC677442) v.

JAMES SPECK et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Michael P. Vicencia, Judge. Affirmed.

McCreary and Duncan J. McCreary for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Ferruzzo & Ferruzzo, Gregory J. Ferruzzo, Alex C. Verdegem and Sean E. Morrissey for Defendants and Respondents. ______________________________ This litigation arises out of a dispute between certain entities and individuals concerning the use of a large electronic sign in the City of Long Beach to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.