In re Richardson CA1/5

Filed 4/27/22 In re Richardson CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

In re EUGENE RICHARDSON A162474 on Habeas Corpus. (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. C164916)

This case is before us following the California Supreme Court’s order to show cause before this court why petitioner is not entitled to relief on his writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner claims his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to argue that petitioner’s youth at the time of the offense should be one of the factors considered during the hearing under Penal Code section 1170.951 to determine if he was eligible for resentencing. The People filed a return, and petitioner filed a traverse and lodged exhibits. Pursuant to our request, the parties submitted supplemental…