Garcia

Garcia v. Daily CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 27, 2022G060969California1,946 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/27/22 Garcia v. Daily CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

HELEN GARCIA,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G060969

v. (Super. Ct. No. 20CV365883)

LEANNE H. DAILY et al., OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, Sunil R. Kulkarni, Judge. Affirmed. Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney, Janet L. Everson and Suzie M. Tagliere for Defendants and Appellants. Hovore Law and F. Thomas Hovore for Plaintiff and Respondent. * * * LeeAnne H. Daily and the Daily and Daily Law Firm appeal from an order denying their special motion to strike Helen Garcia’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.