Ocaranza
Ocaranza v. C.H.L. EMS CA5
Opinion
Opinion
Smith, J.
Filed 4/27/22 Ocaranza v. C.H.L. EMS CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
PHILLIP OCARANZA,
F081481
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. VCU274543) v.
C.H.L. EMS, INC., OPINION Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Nathan D. Ide, Judge. Nelson & Rozier, and Ryan T. Nelson, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Small, Henstridge, Cabodi & Pyles, and Bryan D. Pyles, for Defendant and Respondent. -ooOoo- Plaintiff Phillip Ocaranza brought this medical malpractice and wrongful death action against defendants DVA Renal Healthcare, Inc. dba Tulare Dialysis (Tulare Dialysis) and C.H.L. EMS, Inc. dba American Ambulance of Visalia (C.H.L./American Ambulance or American Ambulance of…