Ocaranza

Ocaranza v. C.H.L. EMS CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 27, 2022F081481California7,283 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

Filed 4/27/22 Ocaranza v. C.H.L. EMS CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

PHILLIP OCARANZA,

F081481

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. VCU274543) v.

C.H.L. EMS, INC., OPINION Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Nathan D. Ide, Judge. Nelson & Rozier, and Ryan T. Nelson, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Small, Henstridge, Cabodi & Pyles, and Bryan D. Pyles, for Defendant and Respondent. -ooOoo- Plaintiff Phillip Ocaranza brought this medical malpractice and wrongful death action against defendants DVA Renal Healthcare, Inc. dba Tulare Dialysis (Tulare Dialysis) and C.H.L. EMS, Inc. dba American Ambulance of Visalia (C.H.L./American Ambulance or American Ambulance of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.