Max

Max v. 8E6 Corp. CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 27, 2022B307406MCalifornia8,623 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/27/22 Max v. 8E6 Corp. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

DAVID MAX, B307406

(Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 19STCV11560)

ORDER MODIFYING

v. OPINION AND DENYING

PETITION FOR REHEARING

8E6 CORP. et al., (NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT)

Defendants and Respondents.

THE COURT:

The opinion in the above-entitled matter filed on March 29, 2022 is modified as follows:

1. On page 4, the second to last sentence in the last paragraph on that page is deleted and replaced with the following: An individual fraud cause of action would not require a bond, and no other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.