People v. Clark CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 28, 2022C092864California970 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/28/22 P. v. Clark CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo) ----

THE PEOPLE, C092864

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CRF16722)

v.

BRANDON ALLAN CLARK,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Brandon Allan Clark asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment. I The factual background is based on testimony at the preliminary hearing, to which the parties stipulated as the factual basis for defendant’s plea. Davis Police Officer John

1 Evans…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.