Cara O'Callaghan v. Janet Napolitano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 202219-56271California484 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 28 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARA O'CALLAGHAN; JENEE No. 19-56271

MISRAJE,

D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:19-cv-02289-JVS-DFM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JANET NAPOLITANO, in her official capacity as President of the University of California; TEAMSTERS LOCAL 2010; ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

CALIFORNIA,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 8, 2022 Portland, Oregon

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: PAEZ and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and TUNHEIM,** District Judge.

Cara O’Callaghan and Jeneé Misraje (“Appellants”) appeal the district

court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss their First Amendment

claims. We affirm.

1. The trial court correctly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.