In re Reese CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 28, 2022B312440California8,627 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/28/22 In re Reese CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re CLARENCE ERVIN REESE, B312440

on Habeas Corpus. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA230274)

PETITION for writ of habeas corpus, Superior Court of Los Angeles County, George G. Lomeli, Judge. Granted in part. Nancy J. King, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Petitioner. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Susan Sullivan Pithey, Assistant Attorney General, Michael R. Johnsen and Yun K. Lee, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. ________________________ In 2004, a jury convicted petitioner Clarence Ervin Reese of first degree felony murder, attempted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.