Williams v. Sonic Automotive CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 2022A162007California3,010 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petrou, J.

Filed 4/29/22 Williams v. Sonic Automotive CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ANTHONY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff and Respondent, A162007 v. SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC. et al., (San Francisco City & County Defendants and Appellants. Super. Ct. No. CGC-20-583846)

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Defendants Sonic Automotive, Inc., FAA Concord H, Inc., and FirstAmerica Automotive, Inc. (collectively, defendants) appeal from a trial court order denying their petition to compel arbitration of a lawsuit filed by plaintiff Anthony Williams. We affirm. I. Williams worked as a salesperson at FAA Concord H, Inc. (Concord Honda), a car dealership, from January to August 2019. After his employment ended,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.