People v. White CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 2022C091461California2,325 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

Defendant argues Senate Bill No. 1437 (2017-2018 Reg. Sess.) effectively eliminated all second degree murder convictions based on implied malice for persons that kill people while driving under the influence of alcohol. We disagree. Senate Bill No. 1437 was enacted “to amend the felony murder rule and the natural and probable consequences doctrine, as it relates to murder, to ensure that murder liability is not imposed on a person who is not the actual killer, did not act with the intent to kill, or was not a major participant in the underlying felony who acted with reckless indifference to human life.” (Stats. 2018, ch. 1015, § 1, subd. (f).) Senate Bill No. 1437 also added section 1170.95, which allows those “convicted of felony murder or murder under a natural and probable consequences theory [to] file a petition with the court that sentenced the petitioner to have the petitioner’s murder conviction vacated and to be resentenced on any remaining counts when all of the following conditions apply: [¶] (1) A complaint, information, or indictment was filed against the petitioner that allowed the prosecution to proceed under a theory of felony murder or murder under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.