William Dillon v. Clackamas County

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 29, 202220-35544California2,322 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 29 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM DILLON; et al., No. 20-35544

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:14-cv-00820-YY

v.

MEMORANDUM**

CLACKAMAS COUNTY; ANGELA

BRANDENBURG,* in her official capacity as Sheriff; and CRAIG ROBERTS, in his individual capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 10, 2022 Portland, Oregon

Before: PAEZ and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and EATON,*** Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants William Dillon, Scott Graue, David Hodges, and

* Angela Brandenburg is substituted for her predecessor, Craig Roberts, as Clackamas County Sheriff. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). ** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. *** Richard K. Eaton, Judge of the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. Albert Love (“Plaintiffs”), former inmates of Clackamas…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.