In re C.Y. CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 3, 2022A163387California4,813 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/3/22 In re C.Y. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re C.Y. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

ALAMEDA COUNTY SOCIAL

SERVICES AGENCY,

Plaintiff and Respondent, A163387 v. (Alameda County

A.Y.,

Super. Ct. Nos. JD033671-01, Defendant and Appellant. JD033672-01, JD033673-01)

A.Y. (mother) appeals from orders of the juvenile court finding it lacked jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) (Fam. Code,1 § 3400 et seq.) to make initial child custody determinations regarding her three children, C.Y., R.Y., and M.Y. Mother argues the juvenile court erred in (1) concluding that Iowa, not California, had subject matter jurisdiction over the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.