People v. Hampton CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 3, 2022C093690California4,307 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/3/22 P. v. Hampton CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C093690

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 07F01659)

v.

JONATHAN ANDREW HAMPTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Jonathan Hampton guilty of involuntary manslaughter and found true an associated firearm enhancement. He was sentenced to an aggregate term of eight years in prison. The trial court imposed a restitution fine of $300 and defendant received 5,043 days of custody credits against his sentence. Defendant was given credit for time served. Defendant appeals, contending the trial court failed to instruct the jury on the intent element of involuntary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.