Marriage of Nakamoto and Hsu CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 4, 2022G059108California7,205 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moore, J.

Filed 5/4/22 Marriage of Nakamoto and Hsu CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re Marriage of CHRISTINE NAKAMOTO and DANIEL HSU.

CHRISTINE NAKAMOTO,

G059108

Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 11D006853) v.

OPINION

DANIEL HSU,

Appellant;

BRION CORPORATION et al.,

Claimants and Respondents.

Appeal from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Orange County, James L. Waltz, Judge. Affirmed. Masson & Fatini, Richard E. Masson and Susan M. Masson for Appellant. Minyard Morris, Alexander Payne; Garrett C. Dailey for Claimants and Respondents. * * * In this appeal, Daniel Hsu (Daniel) asks that we reverse the trial court’s 1 decision denying him need-based attorney fees under Family Code section 2030. The actual dispute underlying his request for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.