Watcharin Luamseejun v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 4, 202221-70496California1,125 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 4 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WATCHARIN LUAMSEEJUN, No. 21-70496

Petitioner, Agency No. A207-134-862

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 14, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and ARTERTON,** District Judge.

Watcharin Luamseejun petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) determinations that she committed particularly serious crimes

that render her ineligible for withholding of removal and that she is not eligible for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Janet Bond Arterton, United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation. deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.