Bruce Allen v. Scott Kernan
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 4, 202220-56022California347 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MAY 4 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
BRUCE ALLEN, No. 20-56022
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-02586-AB-RAO v.
SCOTT KERNAN; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 4, 2022 **
Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges
Bruce Allen appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in
favor of the defendants in his civil rights action alleging deliberate indifference to
serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d
1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.