Bruce Allen v. Scott Kernan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 4, 202220-56022California347 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAY 4 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

BRUCE ALLEN, No. 20-56022

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-02586-AB-RAO v.

SCOTT KERNAN; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 4, 2022 **

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges

Bruce Allen appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in

favor of the defendants in his civil rights action alleging deliberate indifference to

serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d

1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

Summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.