Davis

Davis v. Nicholsen CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 5, 2022A161594California3,441 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/5/22 Davis v. Nicholsen CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

MONICA DAVIS,

Plaintiff and Appellant, A161594 v. HAMILTON NICHOLSEN, (Napa County Defendant and Respondent. Super. Ct. No. 16CV000201)

This is an appeal from final judgment after the trial court granted defendant Hamilton Nicholsen’s motion to enforce a settlement agreement pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure1 section 664.6. Plaintiff Monica Davis seeks reversal on the grounds that there was no enforceable settlement agreement between the parties and even if there were, the judgment impermissibly altered its terms. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The parties are adjacent property…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.