Ghukasian

Ghukasian v. Aegis Security Ins. Co.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 5, 2022B311310California2,701 words

Opinion

Opinion

Currey, J.

INTRODUCTION

Maryam Ghukasian sued Aegis Security Insurance Company (Aegis) for breach of contract, insurance bad faith, and declaratory relief after Aegis denied her tender of a lawsuit brought against her by her neighbors. The underlying lawsuit alleged Ghukasian graded land and cut down trees on her neighbors’ property. The trial court granted Aegis’s motion for summary judgment, holding Aegis had no duty to defend because Ghukasian’s homeowner’s policy did not provide coverage for nonaccidental occurrences. It explained that intentionally cutting trees on the neighbors’ land, even if Ghukasian acted on the good faith but mistaken belief that the trees were on her land, is not an accident for purposes of insurance coverage. Ghukasian appeals from the judgment, contending our Supreme Court’s decision in Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v. Ledesma & Meyer Construction Co. (2018) 5 Cal.5th 216 (Liberty Surplus) impliedly disapproved caselaw holding an intentional act is not an “accident,” as the term is used in the coverage clause of a liability policy, even if the intentional act causes unintended harm. We decline to read Liberty Surplus in that fashion, and therefore affirm.

FACTUAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.