James Herrington v. Thomas Bristol
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAY 5 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES LEROY HERRINGTON, No. 20-35288
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-00680-AC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
THOMAS BRISTOL, Dr.; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
THERAPUTIC LEVEL OF CARE
COMMITTEE; et al.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 4, 2022 **
Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). James Herrington appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in
favor of the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. We have
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the grant of summary
judgment de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and
affirm.