Terrance Walker v. Charter Communications, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 6, 202220-16339California1,000 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 6 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TERRANCE WALKER, Nos. 20-16339 20-17219 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cv-00556-RCJ-CLB

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellee,

and

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 4, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Terrence Walker appeals pro se the judgment in favor of Charter

Communications, LLC (“Charter”) following a jury trial and the district court’s

denial of his motion for a new trial on his race discrimination claims under Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.