Liliana Hobbs v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 6, 202218-71288California836 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 6 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LILIANA HOBBS, AKA Liliana No. 18-71288 Hernandez-Patino, Agency No. A095-129-709 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 11, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: SILER,*** M. SMITH, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Liliana Hobbs petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing her ineffective assistance of counsel claim. She

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. also seeks review of the BIA’s decision affirming the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.