People v. Sanders CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 6, 2022C092234California3,670 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/6/22 P. v. Sanders CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Modoc) ----

THE PEOPLE, C092234

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. F19304)

v.

NATHANIEL KHALID SANDERS, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Nathaniel Khalid Sanders, Jr., pleaded no contest to dissuading a witness by force and sexual battery. The trial court granted him formal probation for four years. Defendant argues the trial court erred in failing to conduct a Marsden1 hearing when he sought to withdraw his plea. He also objects to the condition of his probation prohibiting him from possessing pornography. He further argues the trial court failed to recite each of the fines and fees it imposed on defendant on the record.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.