Jamison

Jamison v. McNeal CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 6, 2022A161846California6,031 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petrou, J.

Filed 5/6/22 Jamison v. McNeal CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

KURITA JAMISON,

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant, and A161846 Respondent,

v. (Solano County Super. Ct. No. FCS049179) LINTON McNEAL, Jr.,

Defendant, Cross-complainant, and Appellant.

Plaintiff Kurita Jamison (Jamison) and defendant Linton McNeal Jr. (McNeal) are joint tenants of property that is the subject of this partition action (Code Civ. Proc., tit. 10.5, § 872.010 et. seq. 1). Following a four-day bench trial, the court entered an interlocutory judgment in which it ordered the property to be partitioned and declared each party an owner of an undivided one-half interest in the

1 All undesignated statutory sections refer to the Code of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.