People v. Sanchez CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 9, 2022H048245California6,280 words

Opinion

Opinion

Danner, J.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Procedural History In January 2020, during trial, the Santa Clara County District Attorney filed a third amended information (information) charging Sanchez with 12 sex crimes involving three minors, Fatima Doe, Beatriz Doe, and Giselle Doe.2 Counts 1 through 4 of the information alleged crimes committed against Fatima between January 5, 2002, and January 4, 2009, namely three counts of a lewd or lascivious act on a child under age 14 (§ 288, subd. (a); counts 1, 2 & 4) and one count of attempted lewd or lascivious act on a child under age 14 (§§ 664, 288, subd. (a); count 3). Counts 5 through 10 alleged a lewd or lascivious act on a child under age 14 committed against Beatriz between April 6, 1997, and April 5, 2001 (§ 288, subd. (a); counts 5–10). Counts 11 and 12 alleged a lewd or lascivious act on a child under age 14 committed against Giselle on or about December 20, 2007 (§ 288, subd. (a); counts 11–12). The information also alleged a multiple-victim enhancement for each count except count 3 (§ 667.61, subds. (b) & (e)). On January 16, 2020, the jury found Sanchez guilty on all counts except count 4, for which the jury could not reach a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.