Nazmul Islam v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 9, 202217-71250California842 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 9 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NAZMUL ISLAM, No. 17-71250
Petitioner, Agency No. A202-013-750
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 10, 2022** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: PAEZ, CLIFTON, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Nazmul Islam (“Islam”), a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for
review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of
removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review an adverse credibility
determination for…