Nazmul Islam v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 9, 202217-71250California842 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 9 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NAZMUL ISLAM, No. 17-71250

Petitioner, Agency No. A202-013-750

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 10, 2022** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: PAEZ, CLIFTON, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Nazmul Islam (“Islam”), a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for

review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review an adverse credibility

determination for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.