Ruben Bonilla-Hernandez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 10, 202220-72183California1,297 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 10 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUBEN BONILLA-HERNANDEZ, No. 20-72183

Petitioner, Agency No. A044-210-111

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 13, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and S. MURPHY, III,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Ruben Bonilla-Hernandez sought review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision to affirm an immigration judge’s (“IJ”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Stephen Joseph Murphy III, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. decision to deny a withholding of removal and Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.