Ruben Bonilla-Hernandez v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 10, 202220-72183California1,297 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 10 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RUBEN BONILLA-HERNANDEZ, No. 20-72183
Petitioner, Agency No. A044-210-111
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 13, 2022** Pasadena, California
Before: CLIFTON and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and S. MURPHY, III,*** District Judge.
Petitioner Ruben Bonilla-Hernandez sought review of a Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision to affirm an immigration judge’s (“IJ”)
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Stephen Joseph Murphy III, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. decision to deny a withholding of removal and Convention Against Torture