Zalena Magaeva v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 202220-70804California837 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 11 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ZALENA MAGAEVA, No. 20-70804 Petitioner, Agency No. A201-683-166

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted November 8, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: COLLINS and LEE, Circuit Judges, and BAKER,*** Judge.

Petitioner Zalena Magaeva, a citizen of Russia, alleges due process

violations in connection with proceedings before the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) and an Immigration Judge (“IJ”), both of whom rejected her

claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(C). *** The Honorable M. Miller Baker, Judge for the United States Court of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.