Tony Goodrum v. Cynthia Tampkins

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 202219-56239California949 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 11 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TONY GOODRUM, No. 19-56239

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:11-cv-02262-AJB-LL v.

CYNTHIA Y. TAMPKINS, Warden, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Anthony J. Battaglia, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 9, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: BERZON, TALLMAN, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Tony Goodrum appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus

petition, in which he alleges that the State of California committed a Napue

violation by knowingly presenting false testimony from a witness during

Goodrum’s trial or, alternatively, by making false statements during a pre-trial

hearing. See Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 269 (1959) (“[A] conviction obtained

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. through use of false evidence, known to be such by representatives…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.