Usdol
Synopsys, Inc. v. Usdol
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 202220-16414California2,364 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 12 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SYNOPSYS, INC., No. 20-16414
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:20-cv-00693-KAW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Defendant-Appellee.
WILL EVANS; THE CENTER FOR No. 20-16416
INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING,
D.C. No. 4:19-cv-01843-KAW Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
SYNOPSYS, INC.,
Intervenor-Appellant,
and
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. for the Northern District of California Kandis A. Westmore, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 4, 2021 San Francisco, California
Before: CLIFTON and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and McSHANE,** District Judge.
Synopsys argues that disclosure by the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”)
of a report containing some of Synopsys’s employment data (“EEO-1 report”), in
response to a Freedom of…