Usdol

Synopsys, Inc. v. Usdol

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 202220-16414California2,364 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 12 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SYNOPSYS, INC., No. 20-16414

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:20-cv-00693-KAW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Defendant-Appellee.

WILL EVANS; THE CENTER FOR No. 20-16416

INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING,

D.C. No. 4:19-cv-01843-KAW Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

Intervenor-Appellant,

and

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. for the Northern District of California Kandis A. Westmore, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 4, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: CLIFTON and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and McSHANE,** District Judge.

Synopsys argues that disclosure by the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”)

of a report containing some of Synopsys’s employment data (“EEO-1 report”), in

response to a Freedom of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.