Sprawldef

Sprawldef v. City of Richmond

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 202220-17503California749 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 12 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SPRAWLDEF, a public benefit No. 20-17503 corporation; et al., D.C. No. 4:18-cv-03918-YGR Petitioners-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF RICHMOND, a California municipality; et al.,

Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 11, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, W. FLETCHER, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Appellants SPRAWLDEF, Citizens for East Shore Parks, and four

individuals appeal from the district court’s denial of leave to amend their operative

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). complaint, and from the district court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings to

appellees City of Richmond, Richmond…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.