O. L. v. Liliana Jara
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
O.L. met her alleged assailant online and went on a date with him. She
claimed that he raped her later that night, and she reported it to the EMPD. O.L.
showed Officer Martha Tate messages on her cell phone between herself and the
alleged assailant. In those messages, O.L. casually discussed the sexual activity that
occurred the night of the alleged rape and agreed to meet him again for a future
sexual encounter. Based on these messages, Officer Tate questioned O.L. about
alcohol use, consent, and her motive for reporting the alleged crime.
O.L.’s case was later transferred to LASD. Detective Liliana Jara interviewed
her. O.L. showed Detective Jara the same messages on her cell phone. Detective
Jara also saw a message in which O.L. told the alleged assailant that she “could make
him lose his job” after she discovered that he had remained active on the online
dating website where they met. The detective, too, questioned O.L. about her motive
for reporting the alleged crime and ultimately told O.L. that her case suffered from
2 many problems.
At the end of the interview, O.L. agreed to provide her cell phone to LASD to
download messages. O.L. provided…