Antonio Madrigal Ojeda v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 202216-70928California626 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 12 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIO MADRIGAL OJEDA, AKA Nos. 16-70928 Antonio Madrigal, 16-73250

Petitioner, Agency No. A075-586-643

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 10, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, W. FLETCHER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Antonio Madrigal Ojeda (“Madrigal”), a Mexican citizen and Lawful

Permanent Resident of the United States, was charged with removability under

§ 237(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i), after being convicted in state court of transporting

methamphetamine in violation of California Health and Safety…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.