Hamideh

Hamideh v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 12, 2022D078537California10,969 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/12/22 Hamideh v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ASHRAF O. HAMIDEH et al., D078537

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2017- 00045253-CU-OE-CTL)

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Katherine A. Bacal, Judge. Affirmed. Mashiri Law Firm, Alex Asil Mashiri; The Jami Law Firm and Tamim Jami, for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Kading Briggs, Theresa A. Kading and Katherine A. Akamine, for Defendant and Respondent. Appellants Ashraf Hamideh and Pouya Abdolrasoul filed a representative action under the Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) (Labor Code,1 § 2698 et seq.) against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.