A.C.

A.C. v. Erica Cortez

Good Law
34 F.4th 783
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 13, 202219-55895California2,801 words

Opinion

Opinion

Seeborg, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

A.C., a minor; A.E.1, a minor; No. 19-55895 A.E.2, a minor, by and through Samuel H. Park, their Guardian ad D.C. No. litem, 3:18-cv-02227- Plaintiffs-Appellants, AJB-AGS

v.

OPINION

ERICA R. CORTEZ, an individual; KATE DWYRE JONES, an individual; COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, a public entity; DOES, 1 through 30 inclusive, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of California Anthony K. Battaglia, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 5, 2021 * Pasadena, California

Filed May 13, 2022

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: Susan P. Graber and Morgan Christen, Circuit Judges, and Richard Seeborg, ** District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Seeborg

SUMMARY ***

Civil Rights

The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that attorneys for the County of San Diego, in defending the County against plaintiffs’ earlier…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.