People v. Nieto CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 2022H047795California7,779 words

Opinion

Opinion

Danner, J.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Procedural History On August 7, 2018, the Santa Cruz County District Attorney filed a first amended information (hereafter information) charging Nieto with two sex crimes involving two “Jane Doe” minors.2 Count 1 alleged a lewd or lascivious act on a child under age 14 committed against Jane Doe 1 on or about or between September 1, 2016, and September 6, 2017 (§ 288, subd. (a); count 1). Count 2 alleged a lewd or lascivious act on a child under age 14 committed against Jane Doe 2 on or about or between September 1, 2016, and September 6, 2017 (§ 288, subd. (a); count 2). The information also alleged that, “within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.61[, subdivisions] (b) and (e), as to counts 1 and 2, that the following circumstances apply: multiple victims” (some capitalization omitted) (hereafter multiple-victim enhancement). In December 2019, a jury found Nieto guilty as charged on both counts and found true the multiple-victim enhancement allegation under “Penal Code Section 667.61.” In January 2020, the trial court sentenced Nieto to 50 years to life in prison, consisting of a term of 25 years to life on count, 1 consecutive to 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.